September 16, 2013

Review: The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller


The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller
Published: 2012, HarperCollins (Originally 2011)
Genre: Adult Historical Fiction/Fantasy
Format: ebook
Source: Personal collection
Goodreads · Amazon · Barnes & Noble



He had been trained, a little, by his father. The rest was—what? Divine? This was more of the gods than I had ever seen in my life. He made it look beautiful, this sweating, hacking art of ours. I understood why his father did not let him fight in front of others. How could any ordinary man take pride in his own skill when there was this in the world? 



I'll admit that I'm a bit disappointed. It's been a while since I've read some Greek mythology or any retellings, but my knowledge and fascination in this subject area was quick to return upon starting The Song of Achilles. The Song of Achilles retells the events leading up to the Trojan War and the war itself from the perspective of Patroclus, the closest friend and ally of Achilles. It was this knowledge that initially drew me to the story. I've read many books based on the history and mythology of Ancient Greece over the years, and, since I'm generally familiar with the events of the stories themselves, I always appreciate it when authors can take a creative approach. 

Patroclus has spent the first decade of his life unloved, told that he's the unworthy heir of King Menoetius. After causing a tragic accident, Patroclus is banished from his kingdom and sent to be raised by King Peleus of Phthia. It is there that Patroclus meets the boy destined to become one of the most important Greeks ever known: Achilles. Together Patroclus and Achilles form a friendship and eventual relationship that helps determine the fate of the Trojan War.

I really did appreciate the fact that Miller chose a different route to retell the story of Achilles' life and the Trojan War. Too many of these retellings focus on the battle itself, on romance and glory and destiny and death. Those elements are still part of The Song of Achilles, but side elements to the relationship that blossoms between Patroclus and Achilles. They are a most unlikely pairing: Patroclus, an exiled former prince who has spent his entire childhood thinking that he's worthless and stupid, and Achilles, the golden prince chosen by the gods for greatness, who nonetheless struggles with the knowledge of his destiny. Because the novel spans from their pre-teen years until their late twenties, Miller is able to carefully craft a nuanced, realistic relationship between the two. The gradual pacing in how Patroclus and Achilles go from wary strangers to companions to good friends to lovers is incredibly well done. It's also worth pointing out that many, many retellings of the Trojan War era choose to leave their relationship ambiguous or interpret it solely as a friendship, so Miller should be lauded for her temerity in acknowledging the fact that their relationship may have been romantic.

Although Patroclus and Achilles are the most important and most well-developed characters, The Song of Achilles has no lack of strong secondary character characterizations, mortal and immortal alike. Achilles' mother, the sea nymph Thetis, has a fairly significant role in this novel, both as Achilles' greatest supporter and as Patroclus' most dangerous enemy. Odysseus is as wily as ever, but he also has a more vulnerable side here. Briseis, far from being the woman who could break Achilles and Patroclus apart, becomes Patroclus' closest confidante. Miller's story touches up many of major players, taking them off the pedestals of time and turning them human. 

The prose in The Song of Achilles is lovely, but I found that it ultimately became a double-edged sword. For the sake of lovely writing, the ten-year-old Patroclus narrating the story from his first-person perspective does not end up sounding like a boy. Reading Patroclus' descriptions of his feelings, surroundings, and of others (especially Achilles) caused me to pause more than once. I tried to be generous and reason that perhaps this is an older Patroclus reflecting back on his youthful experiences. In a way, perhaps that is what Miller intended. But Patroclus' inner descriptions never quite meshed with the spoken dialogue of the characters, especially in the interactions between Patroclus and Achilles. Consequently, I felt a sense of disconnect between Patroclus as our narrator and Patroclus as the boy who grows into a man in Ancient Greece.

After concluding the book, I think I've come to understand just why few authors have chosen Patroclus as their protagonist. For the sake of those few readers who are unfamiliar with how the Trojan War unfolds, I'll avoid giving any specific spoilers. Suffice it to say that by the end of the novel, Patroclus proved to be a poor choice as narrator, forcing Miller to write the final chapters in a stilted and awkward fashion. I appreciate that Miller brought life into an underrepresented yet integral character from the Trojan War, but I do not think that making Patroclus the protagonist was the correct move considering the scope of the story that Miller wanted to tell.

While this book did not work for me quite as well as I had expected it would, a quick glance at Goodreads or Amazon shows that my opinion is not a common one. The Song of Achilles is a well-researched and impressive story, but many of Miller's narrative techniques were not ones that I could personally enjoy. I think this might work best with those who aren't as familiar with the Trojan War as I, or those who aren't as nitpicky about the issues that I mentioned.

Rating: 2.5 stars
author image

Amanda

Amanda loves few things better than sitting down with a cup of tea and a book. She frequently stays up far too late, telling herself she just needs to finish one more page. When she's not wrapped up in the stories of others, Amanda works as a children's librarian in a public library.

8 comments:

  1. Oh I'm sorry this one didn't work as well for you! I absolutely loved it. Truth be told, I'm pretty familiar with the mythology and such, but I think that I found myself so caught up in the story from the beginning that I glossed over the details - I do this all the time. But I did love it quite a bit and I also remember thinking it really interesting the route Miller took.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know! I noticed that you and a number of other reviewers loved this one and I was so hoping that it would work for me too. Oh well. :( Guess we can't like them all.

      Delete
  2. I haven't heard of this one and it's a real shame that you were unable to connect with the characters. Frankly speaking, Greek mythology can sometimes be too heavy-handed for me, so I think I'll be skipping out on this. Thanks for the helpful review, Amanda!(:

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, there are some lovely books on Greek mythology out there, though. I hope to read and find more, and I hope that you'll find some you enjoy as well!

      Delete
  3. I would like to take a minute to bask in the glow of that cover. It is seriously one of my favorite book covers ever. I love the colors and I love the bold use of the helmet. That said, I'm sorry that this book didn't work for you overall. It seems like Miller's use of an unconventional narrator spanned over the period of time that she employed just didn't work. Bummer! This review is very thoughtful and I'm not sure I'll pick this book up to read, but I sure would like that cover on my shelf...or hung on my wall. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a pretty cover, I'll give you that. And I had an ebook version, so unfortunately I didn't get to really enjoy it. Me too - I was looking forward to enjoying this one, but I guess it just wasn't meant to be.

      Delete
  4. This is a wonderful review--and I think it may be the first that I have read for this book. I'm pretty well versed in the Trojan War--so yeah, I wonder if I might be just as critical as you when it comes to this book. That being said, I LOVE that a writer took on Patroclus as the protagonist and narrator--if for no other reason then that it is simply a fresh approach. And brava for examining her and Achilles complicated relationship in full. I was taught that yes, they were indeed lovers, but it was never treated as anything shameful it was simply a testament to their strong bond with each other. I mean come on, we all know those ancient Greek myths and stories are LOADED down with homosexuality along with infidelity, incest, and a host of other somewhat taboo subjects. It's just the way it is. I'm glad that Miller didn't shy away from that topic in her book.

    I'm still on the fence about whether I'll read this. But I do think my library carries it so I just may have to give it a try sometime.

    Fantastic review:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Heather! And that's how I felt upon learning that Patroclus was the narrator. Miller took a number of risks in this book, which I appreciated but ultimately found I couldn't stand behind.
      Maybe you'll enjoy this one more than I do - that's been the case for most other reviewers, I feel like. So if you're interested, you should give it a try! Then we can either commiserate in the fact we both disliked it, or else you can try to convince me of its good qualities. ;)

      Delete

Thank you for taking the time to comment! I strive to make my blog the very best it can possibly be and I appreciate each and every comment on here.