Tiger Lily by Jodi Lynn Anderson
Published: 2012, HarperTeen
Genre: Young Adult Fantasy, Retelling
Source: Library book
Source: Library book
She
felt the warmth of Peter’s arm under her neck, and it almost felt like he was
an extension of her, and like if they had souls, they lay somewhere snug
between their two bodies. Maybe all of her strangeness, her curse, her always
feeling like an outsider, had all existed so that she could belong here, with
Peter.
Apparently I'm going against the
grain here, but, while I really wanted to love Tiger Lily, it did not
work out for me. I feel as though there was so much potential in this book. I'm
always game for a fairy tale retelling, especially those that prominently
feature previously sidelined characters. Unfortunately Tiger Lily failed to meet
my expectations.
Tiger Lily has been a
part of the Sky-eaters tribe ever since its Shaman Tik Tok found her under
a flower as an infant. But Tiger Lily has always felt distanced from her tribe,
and the tribe is hesitant to accept the girl who seems to have a connection
with both the crows and ancestors' spirits. Tiger Lily and the tribe exist in
an uneasy alliance until she disobeys and puts the tribe at risk by helping out
an Englander with the dreaded aging disease, and so it is announced that she will
marry Giant, a man of the tribe, to keep her in line. Though she outwardly
appears to accept the tribe's decision, Tiger Lily does not quell her
rebellious streak. She continues to help the Englander, sees the pirates,
travels to parts of Neverland that others are afraid to see, and eventually
befriends Peter Pan and the Lost Boys. But time continues to count down to her
marriage and the lack of freedom that will come with it.
Although the protagonist of this
story is Tiger Lily herself, Tinker Bell is the narrator. This is a risky move
on Anderson's part and I applaud her for that decision. This narrative
technique is not used very commonly – probably
because it is very difficult to make the narrator simply an observer of the
protagonist. The only book I can think of that's done this sort of thing well
is F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby. In the case of Tiger Lily,
Tinker Bell tells the story in first person and acts like a third person omniscient
narrator, divulging the internal thoughts of those she observes. But I had an
extremely difficult time connecting to any of the characters through this
narrative device, including Tinker Bell herself.
Sometimes a more subtle book without
lots of action or characterization appeals to me, but oftentimes it does not.
Besides having next to no feelings for the narrator, I also couldn't make
myself like Tiger Lily. She's strong and prickly but oh so distant. Tinker
Bell's narration was not enough to bridge the gap between the reader and Tiger
Lily for me. I found myself struggling to understand Tiger Lily's motivations,
her feelings, any sort of drive. As the story continued and the plot got
progressively darker, I could not make any sense of Tiger Lily's actions. I
will say, however, that she felt the most alive to me when she is with Tik Tok
or thinking about Philip and the English outsiders. And she is a fierce
protector of what she loves.
I found myself not quite as
impressed by the worldbuilding as I would have hoped. The story is
set in Neverland, a world of infinite possibilities. I expected the setting to
evoke a sense of wonder and magic, but I didn't really feel that way. Sure,
there were mermaids, pirates, tribes, fairies, and the Lost Boys. But both
Tinker Bell and Tiger Lily took in everything in such a matter-of-fact way that
Neverland just didn't seem very magical.
A lot of my issues stem from the
book's promotional blurb. I was expecting this great romance. I did enjoy how
Peter Pan and Tiger Lily are both broken and scarred (even if neither is willing
to admit it), which allows their relationship to really focus on their personal
healing. But I just didn't feel invested enough in either of those characters.
There's so much unsaid between them, and, even with Tinker Bell's ability to
read internal thoughts, there were too many gaps between the characters
thoughts and their actions. This didn't seem so much of a star-crossed romance
as a friendship that forms out of need. Which is fine but not what I was
expecting.
Anderson does a good job with her
reimaginings of some other characters and explaining why certain things are the
way they are in the original tale. I liked her new interpretations of Captain
Hook (which I felt was spot-on and made a whole lot more sense in terms of his
character development and his desire for vengeance against Peter Pan) and Smee
(though really Smee becomes so incredibly disturbing in this version). I also
liked the portrayal of Wendy Darling. I think that most people equate Wendy as
a nurturer and so innocent. It was refreshing to read about a Wendy who clearly
has some indication of how her arrival so dramatically changes things for
the island of Neverland.
I realize that my only basis of comparison here is the
Disney film Peter Pan. As with my familiarity of Disney's treatment of
other fairy tales like Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland, and Beauty
and the Beast, I know that Disney's version should not be my be-all end-all
for this tale. But it is. I know that Anderson's Tiger Lily will appeal
to many readers out there. Tiger Lily is a fierce female protagonist, there's
forbidden love, there's a deep sense of longing and loss throughout the novel,
and it forces readers to gain perspective on a familiar story. It just wasn't a
great match for me.
I was in the minority as well. I didn't love this one. I was disappointed in the romance and wasn't feeling the characters. I sort of got the beauty in the writing but I felt kind of bored through so much of the book. I think it's just a matter of taste and it wasn't really for me. I'm sad you didn't love it, but feel kind of relieved I'm not the only one.
ReplyDeleteI hear you there! Glad to know I'm not alone as well. And yes! The lack of action, or just in general how I felt that nothing was "told" or "shown" via Tinker Bell's perspective made the book difficult to get through.
DeleteAww, I'm sorry to hear you didn't love this one as much as everyone else did! I know all about being the black sheep, but this was one book I actually really liked. Still, you bring up some excellent points! Wonderful review!(:
ReplyDeleteI know, I was disappointed myself. But not everything works for everyone, obviously. Now I'm curious to see what your thoughts on the book were! Thanks for commenting, Keertana!
DeleteGreat review! Sorry you didn't like this as much as you hoped you would! I'm a little apprehensive about reading this because I don't think I'll like it. I don't know if I eventually will read it or not. I'll have to tell you how The Child Thief is if I ever get to read it. Have you seen Hook or the version with Jeremy Sumpter? I loved them both!
ReplyDeleteI'd suggest you didn't read it lol. We do have some similar reading tastes, and I'm not sure you'd appreciate it any more than I did. I think I saw Hook, a very long time ago. And Finding Neverland. But those are the only other versions I know of.
Delete