Showing posts with label dystopia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dystopia. Show all posts

September 15, 2014

Review: Four: A Divergent Collection by Veronica Roth



Four: A Divergent Collection by Veronica Roth
Series: Divergent, #0.1-0.4
Published: 2014, Katherine Tegen Books
Genre: Young Adult Dystopian
Source: Library
Contains spoilers for Divergent (my review), Insurgent (my review), Allegiant (my review)


I'm not sure bravery is something you acquire more of with age, like wisdom --but maybe here, in Dauntless, bravery is the highest form of wisdom, the acknowledgement that life can and should be lived without fear.


I’m a bit torn on what to think of this. On the one hand, it’s hard not to view this as a money grab, as a way for Roth’s series to continue to stay relevant. On the other hand, I’ll admit it was kind of interesting to delve a bit into the history of Abnegation-born Tobias Eaton, and the chain of events that led him to become Four, a Dauntless instructor.

Four: A Divergent Collection tells the backstory of Four in four (of course) short stories. “The Transfer” focuses on the days leading up - and following - Four’s choosing ceremony. “The Initiate” focuses on the beginnings of Four’s Dauntless training, and the cultivation of his new persona as “Four,” the initiate with only four fears. “The Son” gives a bit more backstory as to why Four chose to transfer factions, and focuses on his familial relationships in particular. “The Traitor” actually is synchronous with the events of Divergent, as Four begins to question his faction and fall for new initiate Tris (not necessarily in that order).
Read more »

August 20, 2014

Series Review: The Legend Trilogy by Marie Lu

Opening Thoughts
Lu’s debut trilogy hadn’t really been on my radar until two coworkers decided to establish an impromptu readalong. Because when do I ever say no to an additional chance to read and discuss books?

I wasn’t overly impressed with Legend and would have been content to end reading the trilogy there, but shortly thereafter I had the opportunity to borrow the remaining two books and took it. And I’m actually glad I did so. Overall, the story got better as the series progressed.

Although I will try to focus here on my general thoughts of this series, this review will contain some spoilers for Legend. I will try to limit spoilers for Prodigy and Champion.

Legend by Marie Lu
Series: Legend, #1
Published: 2011, Penguin
Genre: Young Adult Dystopian
Source: Library

June Iparis has achieved the practically-impossible score of 1500 out of 1500 on the government-mandated Trial each citizen must take at the age of 10. She’s considered to be a prodigy and the Republic of America’s most valuable asset.

Day received a failing score on his Trial, which means that his “inferior” genes are not wanted by the Republic as it continues to wage war against the Colonies, another governmental system developed in the ruined wasteland that once was the United States of America. Day was experimented on and then was supposed to be sent to a “work camp” (in actuality a death camp), but he escaped and has been actively working to thwart the Republic ever since.

The Republic, which has worked so hard to turn June into a model soldier and place Day behind bars, is ultimately responsible for bringing the two of them together. And once together, they discover that neither is able to return to his/her old life ever again.
Read more »

January 7, 2014

Review: Enders by Lissa Price



Enders by Lissa Price
Series: Starters, #2
Published: January 7, 2014, Delacorte Books for Young Readers
Genre: Young Adult Dystopian
Source: From publicist via Netgalley
Contains spoilers for Starters (my review)
Goodreads · Amazon · Barnes & Noble


“I’m telling you, if there’s one thing I learned from this whole body bank mess, it’s that looks are overrated. Beauty isn’t about meeting some holo-star standard, it’s about being you. Because looks come and go. But nobody else can be you.”



Please ignore the terrible cover. It’s not indicative of the story in the slightest. I wasn’t the biggest fan of the original cover for Starters either, but it still fit the story better than these redesigned covers. Oh, well. On to my review of the book itself.

After destroying Prime Destinations and becoming claimed Starters, Callie hopes that she, her little brother Tyler, and her friend Michael can finally live in relative security. But their hard-won peace is threatened by the Old Man who ran Prime Destinations. His business may have been destroyed, but he’s still very much alive and is unwilling to let Callie, the most powerfully altered donor, escape his grasp.

In order to become eligible as a donor for Prime Destinations (informally known as a Metal), Callie and other Starters were subjected to internal and external alterations. Besides being physically appealing, all the Starters had chips inserted into their heads, which would allow their bodies to be controlled by their renters. The chips had limits as to what the renters could do: most importantly, renters could not make their donors engage in anything violent. But Callie’s chip was altered by her renter Helena, and now anyone who controls Callie can not only force her to inflict violence, but she remains conscious as her body is outwardly controlled.

As Callie learns that the Old Man will do whatever it takes to have her within his grasp once moreincluding controlling and killing other Metalsshe’s forced to make unlikely alliances and seek a way to safely remove the chips from all the Metals.

It’s been a while since I’ve read Starters. To be honest, I was worried that I wouldn’t remember too much of it. And there were times here and there where I did feel a bit lost, and not all the book’s jargon came back to me easily. I did remember the twist at the end, though, and that was the aspect I was most excited to see played out in Enders. Besides that, I thought the basics of the storyline are recapped decently well.

I do know that many niggling issues I had with Starters are addressed in the sequel. The battle for dominance between Enders and Starters is better explained. While I still do not completely buy the terrible treatment and abuse that a large percentage of the nation’s underage population has to endure, all became a bit clearer here. Fear appears to be the dominant emotion for both Starters and Enders: the fear of being no longer relevant, the fear of how to provide for oneself on a daily basis. And the conflict between the two generational groups is shown to be not quite as divisive as I’d been lead to believe in Starters.

Indeed, many issues that appeared to be presented in simpler, black-and-white terms in Starters are more thoroughly examined in this installment. Middles, as it turns out, are not completely eradicated, as some leading governmental members (and those with lots of money or fame) were able to obtain vaccinations for themselves. The dynamics between Middles and Enders, or Middles and Starters, are not really the focus of this book, but their continued existence does add a greater dash of reality to this story.

Identity is a core concept explored throughout this duology, and it’s done very well. In the dystopian world first introduced in Starters, Starters (or those under 20) and Enders (or those above 60) are first and foremost identified by their generation. Prestige, power, and wealth all hinge on whether one is an Ender, or whether one is “claimed” by (essentially a close relative) an Ender. As with Starters, I still found it extremely interesting that with the removal of the middle-aged adult population, it is the elderly who have taken power. Starters really have no intrinsic worth to this society, their value only determined through their relations.

The existence of Prime Destinations and Metals is proof not only of how screwed up Callie’s society has become, but how much many Starters are willing to risk in order to gain a semblance of power in their society once more. The money and beauty gained through being a donor are temporary, however, and never quite alter the balance of society.

Speaking of Metals, I do wish that their place within society was better addressed. As Callie and her new ally Hyden race to bring Metals to their safehouse, hidden away from the influence of the Old Man, Callie and readers are subjected to just how well Metals have been coping (or not). Physical alterations aside, it seems as though the majority of their lives have not been significantly improved. They’re still second-class citizens out of the two major divisions of people left alive. There’s a lot to be explored about identity, ageism (perhaps it’s more appropriate to refer to it as reverse-ageism here), and self-worth. I think Price has started to tease out some really compelling concepts here, but they’re not explored to the amount of depth I would have hoped.

The ending is fairly open-ended, but I kind of liked that. Price certainly includes a lot of twists in her book, and for the most part I quite enjoyed them. Some of them made the novel border on cliche, but plenty of others were impressively surprising. I liked the twists that led up to the conclusion, but my head was still reeling from some, and I can’t help but feel as though that made the conclusion a little less powerful for me than it should have been.

Overall, I enjoyed reading this duology. Callie is extra-special in some ways, but I do think she’s a well-crafted and likable character. I wish that Price had focused a bit more on Callie’s relationship with others and the implications and questions that come from a society fractured such as Callie’s is. As it is, this was still an engaging and fun read.

Rating: 3.5 stars

Disclaimer: I received this review copy from the publicist, but that in no way affected my opinion. The quote is from an advanced copy of the novel and is subject to change in the final edition.  
Read more »

November 18, 2013

Review: Pawn by Aimée Carter


Pawn by Aimée Carter
Series: The Blackcoat Rebellion, #1
Published: November 26, 2013, Harlequin Teen
Genre: Young Adult Dystopian
Source: Publisher via Netgalley
Goodreads · Amazon · Barnes & Noble


“They may be weak when the game begins, but their potential is remarkable. Most of the time, they’ll be taken by the other side and held captive until the end of the game. But if you’re careful--if you keep your eyes open and pay attention to what your opponent is doing, if you protect your pawns and they reach the other side of the board, do you know what happens then?”
I shook my head, and she smiled.
"Your pawn becomes a queen." 



Five years after The Hunger Games released, YA dystopian literature is still going strong. I get its appeal and why it continues to resonate with readers. While not my favorite genre, I still tend to enjoy the dystopians I read. At least, I enjoy those works of dystopian literature that stay true to their purpose of providing critiques of  social and political structures of futuristic societies. Nothing infuriates me more than a poorly constructed or subdued dystopian world that has little purpose beyond creating obstacles for star-crossed lovers.

Fortunately, Pawn by Aimee Carter places political and social criticisms as first and foremost in its story. It may not be the most unique offering to YA dystopian literature, but I still found it entertaining and well done overall.

For the past seventeen years, Kitty Doe has grown used to the fact that she’s expendable. She is the unwanted (and illegal) second child of lower-rank parents who have since died. Because of this, she’s grown up in a orphanage for second children, referred to as Extras. Besides her relationship with her best friend Benjy, a fellow orphan and an Extra, Kitty’s been fixated on her seventeenth birthday. In her futuristic United States, people are given a test on their seventeenth birthdays which determines their societal rank from I to VI and their future occupations.

Kitty, with her limited educational resources and reading problems, was doomed to fail from the start. She’s grown up believing in the system’s fairness, however, and thinks her determination to succeed will be enough. The III emblazoned on the back of her neck is not only a shock to her, but she sees it as a declaration of her unworthiness. Most of all, she sees it as confirmation that she and Benjy (a sure VI) will never work out. So when Prime Minister Hart offers her the chance to become a VII, to enjoy a life of wealth and comfort beyond her wildest dreams, Kitty accepts.

Of course, Kitty has no idea the repercussions of the bargain she just made. Only members of the ruling Hart family can have the VII rank, and to become one of them Kitty is masked quite literally, turned into the recently-deceased niece of the Prime Minister, Lila Hart. And her life, which would have been restrictive as a III, becomes even more so as she must give up her old attachments for a brand new life she cannot leave.

Honestly, the reason I was able to enjoy this book to the extent that I did is directly related to Kitty’s first person narration. As I’ve mentioned before, dystopian literature is fairly common, and Carter employs many well-known tropes in her story. Perhaps a bit reminiscent of Katniss, Kitty is naive and initially unwilling to do something about the problems in her world. She’s also a bit too trusting, pigheaded, and backs off of conflicts too easily. Because of these qualities, I found that she was the perfect narrator to introduce readers to her world. Readers who are overly familiar with the intrigue and rebellions between the “haves” and “have nots” of dystopian literature are almost forced to slow down and really appreciate Kitty’s consternation as she finds affirmation after affirmation that nothing is as it seems. These revelations are huge in her understanding of the world, which jaded dystopian readers should keep in mind.

The central conflict in Pawn is not really a rebellion, however. Kitty is more than simply a heroine reluctant to assume the burden of responsibility; her purpose throughout the novel is consistent: find a way to ensure that Benjy is given the life he deserves. She falters here and there, but Benjy acts as a beacon of hope that some things in their life will work out as they should. Benjy has always deserved to gain a high ranking, and Kitty works to ensure that nothing she or anyone else does prevents him from achieving his potential. Pawn starts out with Kitty and Benjy in a committed, long-term relationship, which was actually a nice change from a focus on the throes and drama of a new romance. Not even Lila’s fiancé Knox can throw a wrench into their relationship.

Perhaps the least successful part of this novel was the in depiction of the rebellion and Lila’s role in it. Although Kitty is supposed to be Lila, I never had a good understanding of who Lila was. Her presence in the rebellion was similarly undefined, although Kitty’s interactions with other sympathetic Hart family members begin to shed a bit of light on that. Through her new life as Lila, readers are able to witness the effect of the revolution from the other side: the side of the enfranchised. Readers are also able to see the stark differences in life for the highest class and the lowest of lows (Kitty may not be a I, but she’s an “Extra” in a society that has a strict set of predetermined rules and behaviors for people to follow). The various ways that Carter allows her readers to view the rebellion are interesting, to say the least.

Outside of the rebellion itself, the rest of the political intrigue felt a tad...overzealous of Carter? Literally every single character has incriminating secrets and ulterior motives. Perhaps Carter is simply trying to detail Kitty’s loss of naivety, but it was a bit frustrating for me to see Kitty come to the same conclusion again and again: no one can be trusted. She needs to trust herself. This message is repeated throughout the novel ad nauseam. At least Kitty’s naivety is fairly consistent.

Nothing that Carter has done with Pawn is truly groundbreaking for dystopian literature. But that’s all right. I don’t believe every novel necessarily has to advance its genre. Pawn is entertaining and has some fairly thought-provoking perspectives on rebellion and identity. While I don’t necessarily feel like reading through Carter’s backlog, I will be continuing on with this series.

Rating: 3.5 stars

Disclaimer: I received this review copy from the publisher, but that in no way affected my opinion. The quote is from an advanced copy of the novel and is subject to change in the final edition.  

Read more »

November 6, 2013

Review: Allegiant by Veronica Roth



Allegiant by Veronica Roth
Series: Divergent, #3
Published: 2013, Katherine Tegen Books
Genre: Young Adult Dystopian
Source: Purchased
Contains spoilers for Divergent (my review) & Insurgent (my review)
Goodreads · Amazon · Barnes & Noble




There are so many ways to be brave in this world. Sometimes bravery involves laying down your life for something bigger than yourself, or for someone else. Sometimes it involves giving up everything you have ever known, or everyone you have ever loved, for the sake of something greater.
But sometimes it doesn’t.
Sometimes it is nothing more than gritting your teeth through pain, and the work of every day, the slow walk toward a better life. 



A warning: This review may contain slight spoilers. I’ll refrain from mentioning anything major, but I will need to mention certain aspects of the book that others may consider to be minor spoilers in order to fully articulate my thoughts on this one.

Well, this is a bit disappointing. With the exception of Harry Potter, I haven’t been sucked into the hype of many series still in the process of being written. Unlike Harry Potter, however, the weeks of anticipation leading up to this finale ultimately ended in frustration and dissatisfaction. I would not go so far as to say that I wish I had never read this series, but I do wish I had just waited for a copy of a library book. And maybe actually read some spoilers beforehand.

After Tris and Tobias risked all so that Edith Prior’s message could be broadcast, a message that indicates there’s much more to the world outside of Chicago’s city limits, the two of them do not hesitate to be among the first to find out more about the outside world.

There’s not much tying them down to Chicago anymore as it is. The faction-based life they’ve always known is more unstable than ever, as Tobias’ mother Evelyn continues to have the factionless enforce their beliefs upon the general public. And among the dissenters of the new factionless regime is a group that calls itself the Allegiant, and it has taken Tobias’ father Marcus as one of its leaders. War between the factions has morphed into a war between the faction and the factionless systems.

Tris and Tobias thought that they were leaving behind the instability that comes with division, but the outside world is not what they expected. It’s plagued by many of the same problems that their Chicago factions faced, and then some.

I don’t know what happened with this book. If I had to speculate, I’d say that this is an example of an author being a little bit too ambitious in her aims. Veronica Roth has a lot she wants to explore in the conclusion to her Divergent series, and it’s not all bad. She offers many fascinating explorations of concepts such as bravery, identity, belonging, and individuality. The issue, I think, is that Roth just doesn’t have quite the right expertise to pull off a discussion of them all convincingly.

Part of what made Divergent and Insurgent so much fun was that Roth was not trying to force-feed her readers too many concepts at once. Are the concepts I mentioned above still present in the previous two books? Of course. But whereas in the earlier installments those concepts emerged naturally as the stories unfolded, in Allegiant they felt much more forced, and as a reader I felt as though Roth was trying far too hard to make sure her readers understood the messages she wanted to make.

Although neither Divergent nor Insurgent could be defined as light-hearted, they’re fast and engaging. And honestly, who read those books and didn’t try to figure out figure out which faction they’d want to be a part of? They have their flaws when viewed from a more critical perspective, but I was able to simply allow myself to enjoy the stories being told. Allegiant, unfortunately, is a much slower story. The first half of the novel in particular just drags, as Tris, Tobias, and their friends begin to learn all about the outside world. This ultimately comes down to the fact that Roth left simply too much to be revealed in this third book. If the second book had been less about Tris’ anguish and Roth had introduced this final conflict halfway through Insurgent, then perhaps the transition between the focus of the first two books compared to the final one would have been smoother and more convincing.

My biggest complaint about this novel is that it adopts a new focus that simply does not fit when viewed in comparison to the first two books in this series. After two books focused solely on the faction conflict and Tris’ divergence, those issues are pushed to the side to make way for the major conflicts of this book, which have to do with genetics. That’s right: genetics. The trilogy goes from being purely dystopian to picking up science fiction elements. And issues and plot holes that I was willing to overlook in Divergent and Insurgent become a little more difficult to ignore as Roth tries to give her story a more scientific basis (one with no basis in true science). The addition of a political conflict to the novel makes sense, but that’s also not fully developed enough for me to be satisfied with the lackluster attention to detail there either. When taking into account the new conflicts in this book, it feels as though the story tries to discuss two separate societies and two separate rebellions, neither of which felt satisfyingly concluded by the end.

Before the publication of Allegiant, Roth confirmed that the narration would be shared between Tris and Tobias, rather than told exclusively from Tris’ perspective. I will not rehash how much I dislike dual person narration, but suffice it to say that I went into this book feeling very skeptical about Roth’s reasoning behind turning Tobias into a protagonist. After concluding the book, I understand why Roth decided to make Tobias a protagonist, but I was not satisfied with how it was done. Not only was Roth unable to write a convincing male perspective, but Tobias’ voice sounds identical to Tris’.

The conclusion of Roth’s trilogy makes a lot of sense when one takes into account the character development and story arcs at play. I was upset by the ending not because I think that Roth played with my emotions, but because the context surrounding it does not make sense. At all. Even if characters remain true to their characterizations, I cannot disregard the fact that this story is about more than simply the characters, that it has additional messages to make. And the context of the world that Roth built here doesn’t justify the ending she has.

I wonder how many potential new readers will be turned off from this series simply due to the bad reception of Allegiant. I know I haven’t been praising Allegiant myself, but I did enjoy Divergent and it would be a shame for readers to miss out on that experience simply because they’re wary of the finale.

For me, Allegiant is an example of a series that should not have happened. Veronica Roth can say all she wants that she knew how she wanted this series to end, but the plot and sheer scope of the third book makes me think differently. I am fine with the non-traditional ending, and I liked the messages that Roth had about identity and the greater good, even if they do feel heavy-handed at times. My primary wish for this trilogy would be that it had been better planned and could therefore function as a cohesive whole, but what can you do?

Rating: 2 stars

Read more »